I don’t like whataboutery.
I wouldn’t have a lot of time for his stance on a lot of issues. But that does not negate what points he has to make on this one. Points which the family and their supporters have been consistently asked to prove are falsehoods but do not. And with the libel laws being what they are in this country you’d think they’d be at the High Court in a flash if they felt defamed.
Re: SF. There support for an ideology that is anti Christian and anti woman is staggering. And it is supporting a tyranny. I’d agree with him on that.
And I think some people may be confusing moderate Muslims with tha Muslim Brotherhood, which IS devoted to the destruction of Judaism and Coptic Christianity. So I guess all of them WOULD be in favour of church burning etc.
That the man has other disagreeable views does not make him wrong on this.
RTÉ for example also reported that his sisters had been found innocent. Did anyone know they were on trial in absentia? Because they skipped bail?
Some family loyalty there.
He also needs to explain what happened to his passport.