Ballymun won the league fair and square, Vincents played an illegal player, the score at the end of the game was a 1 point win for Vincents, dont understand the secrecy of this. Yes Vincents won the game by a point, but played an illegal player so thus correctly Ballymun were awarded the game on these grounds, its also fair to say Vincents would probably not have won the game without this player.
With regards to during the game, I cant say for certain whether your above facts are true, at the final whistle, Ballymun players were of the opinion that they had lost the game, Vincents players were of the opinion they had won the game, it doesnt matter now as Vincents were subsequently wrong to play the player in question. I just dont understand the secrecy in admitting that Vincents won the game on the day. Anyway, it is irrelevant now so a line should be just drawn under it.
Congratulations to Ballymun, deserved winners of the league.